I know that much has already been said about President Trump, and some might wonder if there’s anything new to be added to the conversation. But this isn’t about just him. This is about something much deeper—a call for constructive, respectful dialogue in a time when it’s desperately needed.
I want to share my thoughts without fear of assumptions. I want to voice my opinion without immediately being placed on “the other side”—whatever that even means. I know these reactions are inevitable, so above all, I want to offer a different way. As Christians, as Americans, we should be able to engage in civil discourse about the things we believe are good and the things we recognize as harmful. There is a desperate need for nuance.
The polarization of political opinions often forces us into rigid ideological camps, where any level of agreement with one policy is assumed to indicate full alignment with that particular leader or that particular party.
However, one can acknowledge and support specific policies while critically assessing the character and impact of a political figure. Moral consistency demands that individuals speak honestly about both the good and the harmful aspects of leadership and governance. I pray we begin to engage in healthier and more constructive forms of dialogue where people can acknowledge complexities without being vilified or dismissed.
It’s not all or nothing. It’s not either-or. I don’t have to support Trump’s policies on diversity and inclusion just because I might agree with him on abortion. I don’t have to defend a man’s character simply because I align with some of his policies. And I don’t have to justify the means just because I might approve of the end. The means will always re-shape the end anyway.
Recently, my daughter memorized Lyndon Johnson’s speech to Congress before the Voting Rights Act was enacted. His speech remains deeply relevant today, underscoring that success is hollow if it comes at the cost of human dignity. These lines spoke deeply to me:
“And should we defeat every enemy, should we double our wealth and conquer the stars, and still be unequal to this issue, then we will have failed as a people and as a nation. For with a country, as with a person, ‘What is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?’”
What if, at the end of the next four years, we have doubled our wealth and conquered the stars yet lost sight of the sacred truth that every human being—regardless of birthplace, political party, gender, race, or sexual orientation—is made in the image of God? Did we succeed? Did we make America great?
Bishop Budde’s sermon at President Trump’s inauguration offered a beautiful vision of unity, rooted in sacrificial love. She said,
“For unity, at times is, sacrificial in the way that love is sacrificial — a giving of ourselves for the sake of another. In his sermon on the Mount, Jesus of Nazareth exhorts us to love, not only our neighbors, but to love our enemies and to pray for those who persecute us. To be merciful as our God is merciful. To forgive others as God forgives us. And Jesus went out of his way to welcome those whom his society deemed as outcasts.
Now I grant you that unity and this broad expansive sense is aspirational and it’s a lot to pray for. It’s a big ask of our God — worthy of the best of who we are and who we can be. But there isn’t much to be gained by our prayers if we act in ways that further deepen the divisions among us.”
Click here for the full sermon transcript.
She acknowledged that unity of this kind is aspirational—an ideal that requires the best of who we are. Yet, there’s little value in praying for unity if we then act in ways that deepen the divisions among us.
President Trump’s response to Bishop Budde is an example of what happens when we abandon the principles of civil discourse. His dismissive comments serve as a stark contrast to the type of conversation we need — one where we listen, reflect, and engage thoughtfully rather than resorting to insults and labels.
President Trump responded the following day, calling Bishop Budde a “radical left, hard-line Trump-hater.” He continued that “she brought her church into the World of politics in a very ungracious way,” he wrote on Truth Social. “She was nasty in tone, and not compelling or smart. She failed to mention the large number of illegal migrants that came into our Country and killed people. Many were deposited from jails and mental institutions. It is a giant crime wave that is taking place in the USA. Apart from her inappropriate statements, the service was a very boring and uninspiring one. She is not very good at her job! She and her church owe the public an apology!”
To have the leader of the free world resort to mockery and vilification should not be tolerated. Name-calling and labeling have a powerful way of distorting our perception of others, reducing complex, multidimensional individuals into mere caricatures. When we typecast someone—whether by their political affiliation, background, or any single trait—we begin to see them through the narrow lens of that label, rather than as a full person created by God with unique experiences. When an entire political party accepts this behavior, we run the risk of doing the very same thing to others.
Over time, these labels become walls that separate us, reinforcing stereotypes and preventing meaningful understanding. What if, instead of continuing down this path, we chose to see each other as individuals, capable of thoughtful dialogue and shared humanity?
Unity isn’t achieved through blind allegiance or rigid loyalty to political parties or leaders. It is found in our willingness to engage with each other as individuals—each made in the image of God, each worthy of respect and dignity. True unity requires a willingness to embrace complexity rather than simplify the issues we face into boxes of right and wrong, us and them.
We must challenge ourselves to speak truthfully, without fear of being labeled or dismissed, and to listen with compassion, even when we disagree.








